Civil and Human Rights

Comments on HUD’s implementation of the Fair Housing Act’s Disparate Impact Standard

In Brief

Everyone is entitled to seek housing free from discrimination.
A new rule proposed by the Trump Administration would gut the Fair Housing Act’s disparate impact standard, making it harder for marginalized communities to prove discrimination in the housing market.
The proposed rule contravenes the very purpose of the Fair Housing Act by making it easier for companies to discriminate.

CAC submitted a public comment to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regarding the Trump Administration’s attempt to dismantle the disparate impact standard for the Fair Housing Act.

In our comment, we urged HUD to not move forward with the proposed rule but instead maintain the current rule and carry out HUD’s statutory role by vigorously enforcing the Fair Housing Act to remove discriminatory barriers to housing choice throughout the housing market. There is no good reason for revising the existing rule, which reflects long settled principles of disparate impact liability long affirmed by the courts. Adopting the proposed rule would contravene the purpose of the Fair Housing Act and would be a step towards perpetuating inequality.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2024

Podcast (We the People): Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?

National Constitution Center
A Tennessee law prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender transition surgery and hormone therapy. Professor Kurt...
Civil and Human Rights
December 4, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court Should Not Turn Equal Protection Clause on its Head in Case about Medical Care for Transgender Adolescents

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in United States...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District

In Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether lost educational opportunities are compensable under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Stanley v. City of Sanford

In Stanley v. City of Sanford, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Americans with Disabilities Act protects against disability discrimination with respect to retirement benefits distributed after employment. 
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Skrmetti

In United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court is considering whether Tennessee’s ban on providing gender-affirming medical care to transgender adolescents violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Civil and Human Rights
July 31, 2024

Supreme Court Allows Cities to Punish Homelessness

The Regulatory Review
At the end of its 2023-24 term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued several divided decisions...
By: Brian R. Frazelle