Civil and Human Rights

Victory for Marriage Equality and the Constitution

Washington, DC – On news today that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld a lower court ruling that California’s Proposition 8, which limits marriage to heterosexual couples in the state, is unconstitutional, Constitutional Accountability Center released the following statement.

CAC President Doug Kendall said, “In its opinion today, the appeals court affirmed that the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause applies to all ‘persons’ in this country and forbids the government from stripping rights away from any group of persons based on prejudice. That is a victory not only for gay men and lesbians who want to marry, but also for every American who values our Constitution’s guarantee of equality.”

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans added, “‘We the People’ took the principle of equality in the Declaration of Independence and perfected it in the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.  Contrary to the flawed views of those such as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, the Ninth Circuit panel majority today showed that conservative advocate Ted Olson’s view of the broad sweep of the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equality is the right one.”

#

Resources:

Constitutional Accountability Center’s “friend of the court” brief in Perry v. Brownhttps://www.theusconstitution.org/cases/perry-v-brown

CAC’s analysis of the December 2010 oral argument in Perry : https://www.theusconstitution.org/text-history/2411

Perfecting the Declaration: The Text and History of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, David Gans, November 2011: https://www.theusconstitution.org/media/releases/new-study-shows-why-justice-scalia-wrong-%E2%80%93-and-ted-olson-right-%E2%80%93-constitutional

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

 

More from Civil and Human Rights

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes