Access to Justice

Supreme Court Closes Courthouse Door To Important Medicaid Lawsuits

Washington, DC – On news today that the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a divided ruling in Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc., Constitutional Accountability Center released the following reaction:

 

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans said, “Make no mistake, the practical effects of this ruling are enormous for ordinary Americans. The Court today turned its back on the principle of access to our federal courts, leaving low income people seeking access to health care to the vagaries and limitations of the executive branch.”

 

CAC Appellate Counsel Brianne Gorod continued, “Unfortunately, this case is just the latest in a long line of Roberts Court cases that bend over backwards to allow corporations to enforce federal rights, while closing the courthouse doors to ordinary Americans and minorities seeking to enforce theirs. That said, one silver lining of today’s decision is that all members of the Court recognized that there is a long history of the right to go to federal court to redress unlawful state action. Hopefully at least some members of the Court will remember that history and strike the balance in favor of court access in future rulings.”

 

#

 

Additional Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc.: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Armstrong_v_Exceptional_Child_Center_14-15_CAC_Amicus.pdf

 

“Can Plaintiffs Be Denied Their Day in Court Because a Remedy is Costly?: The Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc.,” David H. Gans, January 22, 2015: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/3068/can-plaintiffs-be-denied-their-day-court-because-remedy-costly-supreme-court-hears 

 

Roberts at 10: Roberts’s Consistent Votes to Close the Courthouse Doors, Brianne Gorod: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Roberts-at-10-Access-to-the-Courts.pdf 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Access to Justice

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes