Immigration and Citizenship

Supreme Court Asked To Review The President’s Immigration Actions In The Current Term

Washington, DC – On news today that the U.S. Department of Justice filed for certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court to seek resolution of a dispute over President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents program (DAPA), Constitutional Accountability Center issued the following reaction:

 

“The government’s decision to seek Supreme Court review of President Obama’s immigration action is welcome,” said CAC Appellate Counsel Brianne Gorod, a former clerk to Justice Stephen Breyer. “The Court can easily hear this case in the current Term, which is important given both the case’s significance and the fact that the lower courts have blocked the President’s action from going into effect. In fact, given the Court’s normal procedures, it would risk the appearance of engaging in politics if the Court didn’t hear the case this Term.”

 

“The Fifth Circuit dragged its heels,” said CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra, “but the Supreme Court clearly has time to hear the case this Term and we look forward to seeing this critical question resolved by June.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief on behalf of a bipartisan group of former members of Congress, including Ray LaHood, Jim Leach, and Henry Waxman: http://theusconstitution.org/cases/texas-v-united-states-5th-cir 

 

“Time for the Fifth Circuit to rule,” Brianne Gorod, The Hill, October 21, 2015: http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/judicial/257487-time-for-the-fifth-circuit-to-rule 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Nairne v. Landry

In Nairne v. Landry, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the Voting Rights Act’s prohibition on vote dilution is a constitutional exercise of Congress’s Fifteenth Amendment enforcement power.
Voting Rights and Democracy
 

United States v. Paxton

In United States v. Paxton, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the Materiality Provision in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits states from denying the right...
Voting Rights and Democracy
 

Mi Familia Vota v. Petersen

In Mi Familia Vota v. Petersen, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is considering whether requiring voters to include their birthplace on voter registration forms violates the Materiality Provision of the...
Rule of Law
 

Iowa v. SEC

In Iowa v. SEC, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is considering the legality of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s new climate-related disclosure requirements.
Rule of Law
 

Chamber of Commerce v. CFPB

In Chamber of Commerce v. CFPB, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering the legality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s update to its Examination Manual clarifying that discrimination may...
Rule of Law
 

Lackey v. Stinnie

In Lackey v. Stinnie, the Supreme Court is considering when a civil rights plaintiff is entitled to attorney’s fees as the “prevailing party” in a case.