Rule of Law

Senators are suing to get “unconfirmed lackey” Matt Whitaker’s appointment declared unconstitutional

The legal challenges to Matt Whitaker’s recent installment as acting Attorney General just keep piling up, with three Democratic senators formally bringing suit Monday.

Sens. Richard Blumenthal (Connecticut), Mazie Hirono (Hawaii) and Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Island) filed a federal complaint in Washington, D.C., seeking to have Whitaker’s appointment by the president to the top DOJ post declared unconstitutional.

“The stakes are too high to allow the president to install an unconfirmed lackey to lead the Department of Justice — a lackey whose stated purpose, apparently, is undermining a major investigation into the president,” said Whitehouse in a statement. Whitaker served as U.S. Attorney for Iowa from 2004 to 2009, and sat on the board of a Miami-based scam company that hawked patents for everything from time travel technology to hot tubs.

The three senators filed suit with the aid of two nonprofit law firms — Protect Democracy and the Constitutional Accountability Center — joining a growing chorus of lawyers and politicians objecting to the appointment.

Whitaker, a Trump loyalist and vocal skeptic of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into the president’s communications with Russia during the 2016 election, previously worked as former attorney General Jeff Sessions’ chief of staff. His appointment following Sessions’ ouster the day after the midterms circumvented the existing Justice Department hierarchy where Rod Rosenstein would have been next in line, blindsiding lawmakers and stoking fears that Trump’s ultimate goal was to dismantle the Mueller probe, which Whitaker now oversees.

Last week, a host of lawyers, including conservative Republicans from the Federalist Society, released statements against Whitaker’s appointment, and lawyers in Maryland asked the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene.

Under the Vacancies Reform Act, the president can appoint someone to a position that would normally require Senate confirmation, while he or she finds a permanent replacement. By law, Whitaker can serve for up to 210 days as Acting Attorney General – and potentially longer, depending on the confirmation process of his successor. And though his tenure at the helm of the Justice Department will be short-lived, Democrats fear that Whitaker could do significant damage.

And Senators say that another law, the Constitution Appointments Clause, makes it clear that the Senate is required to confirm high-ranking federal government officials including Attorney General, before they start work.

“President Trump is denying Senators our constitutional obligation and opportunity to do our job: scrutinizing the nomination of our nation’s top law enforcement official,” said Blumenthal in a statement. “The reason is simple: Whitaker would never pass the advice and consent test. In selecting a so-called “constitutional nobody” and thwarting every Senator’s constitutional duty, Trump leaves us no choice but to seek recourse through the courts.”

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Federal judge dismisses Trump classified documents criminal case

Kansas Reflector
MILWAUKEE — The federal classified documents case against former President Donald Trump was dismissed Monday...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Ashley Murray