Federal Courts and Nominations

Senate GOP Leaders Decide To Opt Out Of Governing

Washington, DC – Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley and his Republican colleagues on that Committee today declared that they plan to obstruct anyone who President Obama nominates to fill the Supreme Court vacancy opened by Justice Antonin Scalia’s death last week – including a refusal to hold hearings on or even meet with that nominee. To this news, CAC President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

 

“If a Senator is going to serve on the Judiciary Committee, they should know what the Constitution actually says. When it comes to nominations, the Constitution’s text is clear. The President’s duty under Article II is mandatory, saying that ‘he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint… Judges of the supreme Court.’ The Senate has a duty as well. Senators are free to reject a particular nominee, but what the Framers did not contemplate was a complete and shameful refusal by the Senate to even participate in the process.

 

“If the Senate’s leadership continues this course, they simply will have opted out of governing. They will hamstring the Supreme Court over two Terms, and transmit the virus of dysfunction from Congress into the one branch of the federal government doing a job the American people actually approve of.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

Letter from Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans on obstructing any nominee from President Obama to the U.S. Supreme Court, February 23, 2016: http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/NomineeLetter.pdf 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes