Civil and Human Rights

RELEASE: Challengers’ Argument In Fulton Could “Require Governments To Allow All Manner Of Discrimination”

WASHINGTON – Following oral argument this morning in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, Constitutional Accountability Center Appellate Counsel Ashwin Phatak had the following reaction:

The First Amendment does not prevent a city government from prohibiting discrimination against same-sex couples in its foster-placement program. Indeed, the Court’s precedents make clear that the government has substantial leeway to run its own foster-placement program as it sees fit, and that is especially so to achieve an important governmental interest like prohibiting discrimination. Moreover, as a number of questions in today’s argument revealed, the consequences of holding otherwise would be profound and potentially require governments to allow all manner of discrimination—on bases as varied as race, sex, or religion—by government contractors. Neither the Constitution nor the Court’s precedents provide any support for going down that road.

#

Resources:

CAC’S case page in Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, including our brief on behalf of First Amendment scholars: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/fulton-v-city-of-philadelphia/

“The Fate of Anti-Discrimination Laws Lies With the Supreme Court,” CAC Blog, Becca Damante, August 21, 2020: https://www.theusconstitution.org/blog/the-fate-of-anti-discrimination-laws-lies-with-the-supreme-court/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2024

Podcast (We the People): Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?

National Constitution Center
A Tennessee law prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender transition surgery and hormone therapy. Professor Kurt...
Civil and Human Rights
December 4, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court Should Not Turn Equal Protection Clause on its Head in Case about Medical Care for Transgender Adolescents

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in United States...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District

In Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether lost educational opportunities are compensable under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Stanley v. City of Sanford

In Stanley v. City of Sanford, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Americans with Disabilities Act protects against disability discrimination with respect to retirement benefits distributed after employment. 
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Skrmetti

In United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court is considering whether Tennessee’s ban on providing gender-affirming medical care to transgender adolescents violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Civil and Human Rights
July 31, 2024

Supreme Court Allows Cities to Punish Homelessness

The Regulatory Review
At the end of its 2023-24 term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued several divided decisions...
By: Brian R. Frazelle