Civil and Human Rights

RELEASE: CAC Supports the Abolition Amendment

WASHINGTON – Upon the introduction by Oregon U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley and Congresswoman Nikema Williams (GA-05) of a constitutional amendment—known as the Abolition Amendment—that would strike that part of the Thirteenth Amendment that allows slavery or involuntary servitude to continue in the United States “as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted,” Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following statement:

This effort to pass and ratify the Abolition Amendment joins a proud, centuries-long struggle to bend the arc of America’s Constitution further toward progress. The work started by Reconstruction is not finished. And by deciding we cannot allow any exception to the prohibition of slavery and involuntary servitude to persist in the Constitution, we stand on the shoulders of giants whose legacies call upon us today to make our union ever more perfect, more equal, more inclusive, and more free.

#

Resources:

“AHEAD OF JUNETEENTH, MERKLEY, WILLIAMS PROPOSE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO CLOSE SLAVERY LOOPHOLE IN 13TH AMENDMENT,” June 18, 2021: https://www.merkley.senate.gov/news/press-releases/ahead-of-juneteenth-merkley-williams-propose-constitutional-amendment-to-close-slavery-loophole-in-13th-amendment-2021

Amendment text as introduced in the 117th Congress: https://www.merkley.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/21.06.17%20Abolition%20Amendment.pdf

Summary explanation of the Abolition Amendment: https://www.merkley.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/The%20Abolition%20Amendment%20One%20Pager%20-%20117th_.pdf

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
February 27, 2025

What You Should Know About the Right to Protection in the Trump Era

Washington Monthly
The 14th Amendment was meant to enforce the laws equally, not put vulnerable populations in...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Shilling v. Trump

In Shilling v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington is considering whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
February 19, 2025

History of the North Dakota Constitution Amicus Brief in Access Independent Health Services Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Wrigley

Center for Reproductive Rights
Amicus is the Constitutional Accountability Center, a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Talbott v. Trump

In Talbott v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional. 
Civil and Human Rights
March 13, 2025

Equality and Protection: The Forgotten Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment

102 Denv. L. Rev. (forthcoming 2025)
Civil and Human Rights
North Dakota Supreme Court

Access Independent Health Services Inc. v. Wrigley

In Access Independent Health Services Inc. v. Wrigley, the North Dakota Supreme Court is considering whether North Dakota’s abortion ban violates the state constitution.