REACTION: CAC Attorneys Comment On Supreme Court Marriage Arguments

SUPREME COURT PLAZA, Washington, DC – Minutes after the completion of oral arguments in the marriage cases at the U.S. Supreme Court today, Constitutional Accountability Center attorneys who were in the Court for today’s proceedings issued the following reaction:

CAC Vice President Judith E. Schaeffer said, “Ultimately, today during oral argument, the opponents of marriage equality proved unable to answer or provide any good reason why the loving couples before the Court should not enjoy the dignity of marriage.”

CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans continued, “Even the states’ attorney went so far as to say that marriage doesn’t confer dignity, to which Justice Kennedy expressed his firm disagreement.”

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra said, “While some of the justices expressed hesitation about having a court instead of voters vindicate these constitutional guarantees, that’s exactly why we have these provisions: So we don’t have to ask our neighbors for permission. As Solicitor General Verrilli said, ‘Gay and lesbian people are laying claim to the promise of the Fourteenth Amendment. Now.’”

#

Resources:

CAC’s “friend of the court” brief in Obergefell v. Hodges: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/CAC_Amicus-Obergefell_v_Hodges.pdf

“Why the Constitution Trumps Any State’s Ban on Same-Sex Marriage,” The New Republic, April 23, 2015: http://www.newrepublic.com/article/121623/constitution-not-voters-should-have-final-say-gay-marriage

“When Deciding Gay Marriage, SCOTUS Should Listen to John Roberts’ Confirmation Hearing,” Slate, March 26, 2015: http://www.slate.com/blogs/outward/2015/03/26/gay_marriage_scotus_should_listen_to_john_roberts_confirmation_hearings.html

Roberts at 10: “John Roberts and LGBT Rights  –​ The Jury is Still Out,” April 2015: http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Roberts_at_10-LGBT.pdf

##
 
Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes