Civil and Human Rights

Prominent Republicans And Democrats Tell SCOTUS: President Obama’s Immigration Actions Are Lawful

Washington, DC – Today, Constitutional Accountability Center filed a key “friend of the court” brief on behalf of prominent Republican and Democratic former Members of Congress, in support of the Obama Administration in defense of its immigration actions currently being challenged at the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of U.S. v. Texas.

 

CAC President Elizabeth Wydra said, “The Obama Administration’s immigration action was clearly lawful, and few people know that better than Republican and Democratic former Members of Congress who wrote much of America’s immigration laws. Those laws give the executive branch significant discretion to determine how they are best implemented in a manner that serves the national interest in public safety and national security. 

 

“The action at issue here,” Wydra continued, “is legally no different than countless other exercises of executive discretion engaged in by presidents of both parties and blessed by both parties in Congress. Our brief shows this shouldn’t be a partisan issue. Instead, this challenge is a blatantly political lawsuit that has needlessly disrupted the lives of millions of children and families in America – a situation the President’s action was designed to alleviate.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

CAC’s amicus curiae brief in U.S. v. Texas on behalf of former Members of the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate: Michael Barnes, Howard Berman, Victor H. Fazio, Charles Gonzalez, Gary Hart, Tom Harkin, Elizabeth Holtzman, Raymond H. (“Ray”)  LaHood, James A. Leach, Carl Levin, Richard Lugar, George Miller, John E.  Porter, Silvestre Reyes, David Skaggs, Mark Udall, Henry A. Waxman, Tim Wirth http://theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/United_States_v_Texas_Amicus_Brief_Final.pdf 

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes