Immigration and Citizenship
PODCAST (National Constitution Center): Can the Trump Administration End DACA?
Josh Blackman is an Associate Professor of Law at the South Texas College of Law Houston and an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute. He has twice testified before the House Judiciary Committee on the constitutionality of executive action on immigration and health care. Josh is the founder and President of the Harlan Institute, and blogs at JoshBlackman.com.
Brianne Gorod is Chief Counsel at the Constitutional Accountability Center. She was previously a Supreme Court and appellate lawyer in private practice, and served as an Attorney-Adviser in the Office of Legal Counsel at the Department of Justice. She also clerked for Justice Stephen Breyer on the Supreme Court.
More from Immigration and Citizenship
June 3, 2024
Improper DHS Appointment Voids Asylum Rule, Groups Argue
Law360 (June 3, 2024, 8:43 PM EDT) -- Two immigrant advocacy groups suing the federal...
June 23, 2023
RELEASE: Supreme Court Decision Allows Administration to Prioritize Certain Noncitizens for Immigration Enforcement, as Presidential Administrations Have Done for Decades
WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s announcement of its decision this morning in United...
January 17, 2023
RELEASE: Supreme Court Considers Access to Courts for Asylum-Seekers
WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Santos-Zacaria v....
November 29, 2022
RELEASE: Justices Acknowledge the Federal Government’s Authority over Immigration Enforcement When Confronted With State Opposition
WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in United States...
September 19, 2022
RELEASE: Biden Administration Memo Setting Priorities for Immigration Enforcement Is Lawful, Group of Former DHS and INS Officials Tell Supreme Court
WASHINGTON, DC – Earlier today, the Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) filed a brief in the...
U.S. Supreme Court
United States v. Texas
In United States v. Texas, the Supreme Court considered whether Department of Homeland Security guidance on immigration enforcement priorities is lawful.