Rule of Law

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against Donald Trump, the co-chairs of the Not Above the Law coalition released the following statement:

“This ruling is flatly wrong on the law. The special counsel statute is clear. Its constitutionality has been upheld by multiple courts in the past, and Judge Cannon has no grounds to reject such a well-settled principle.

“Accountability, protecting the rule of law, and justice cannot be further delayed. We expect Judge Cannon’s ruling not only to be swiftly appealed, but also promptly reversed.”

The statement is signed by Not Above the Law Co-Chairs: Lisa Gilbert, Co-President of Public Citizen; Praveen Fernandes, Vice President of the Constitutional Accountability Center; David Sievers, Interim Organizing Director at MoveOn; and Brett Edkins, Managing Director for Policy and Political Affairs, Stand Up America.

Additional Background

Over the last seven years, the nonpartisan Not Above the Law coalition—which represents tens of millions of Americans from member-based organizations—has mobilized Americans from across the country to demand accountability for those who instigated and participated in the insurrection, defend the rule of law from extremists like Donald Trump, and encourage lawmakers to pass federal democracy reform measures to protect Americans’ freedom to vote.

The findings of a recent May Navigator Research report show that Americans widely believe that no one, including former President Donald Trump, is above the law. This closely mirrors the Not Above the Law coalition poll from Hart Research that found that Donald Trump should be held accountable for his actions just like everyone else. Both polls highlight that a significant majority of Americans view the charges against Trump as serious, with a strong bipartisan consensus that he should be held accountable if found guilty.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Catholic Charities Fort Worth v. Department of Health and Human Services

In Catholic Charities Forth Worth v. Department of Health and Human Services, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether the Trump administration’s unilateral decision to freeze funding appropriated for...
Rule of Law
March 5, 2025

The Virtues and Necessity of Independent Agencies

In the month and a half since President Trump took office for his second term,...
By: Alice Lesniak
Rule of Law
March 1, 2025

Did The Supreme Court Already Accept Donald Trump’s Autocratic Vision Of The Presidency? Trump Thinks So.

HuffPost
The disastrous consequences of the Supreme Court’s immunity decision in Trump v. United States may...
Rule of Law
February 25, 2025

Trump defying a court order would trigger a constitutional crisis

The Hill
As federal courts continue to issue injunctions blocking President Trump’s efforts to seize new extra-constitutional...
By: David H. Gans
Rule of Law
February 25, 2025

RELEASE: Today’s Deeply Disappointing Supreme Court Decision Undermines Access to the Courts in Contravention of Congress’s Plan

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Lackey v. Stinnie, a...
Rule of Law
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Harris v. Bessent

In Harris v. Bessent, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s firing of Merit Systems Protection Board Chair Cathy Harris was illegal.