Constitutional Accountability Center Constitutional Accountability Center
Immigration and Citizenship

Members of Congress Ask Justices: Stop Trump’s Muslim Travel Ban Overreach

Washington, DC – Today, U.S. Senator Chris Coons (DE) and Representative Zoe Lofgren (CA) – who previously led 165 Members of Congress in a brief filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit – today filed a new “friend of the court” brief at the U.S. Supreme Court in Trump v. Hawaii. Coons and Lofgren ask the Justices to halt President Trump’s latest attempt to implement his Muslim travel ban against grandparents and other close family relatives of certain immigrants, as well as refugees who have a bona fide relationship to the United States.

Read the brief filed today here.

“The Trump Administration’s position defies common sense,” said CAC Chief Counsel Brianne Gorod, “and nothing in the law justifies their arbitrary line-drawing. To argue that someone’s grandmother does not count as a ‘close familial relationship’ – as outlined by the Supreme Court in its order handed down last month – is both irrational and inexcusable.”

“The Trump Administration’s view is out of step with how closely most families across the globe hold relatives such as grandparents,” added CAC Civil Rights Director David Gans. “In fact, the Supreme Court has expressly described ‘uncles, aunts, cousins, and especially grandparents’ as ‘close relatives.’ Moreover, the Trump Administration’s banning of refugees who can demonstrate a bona fide relationship with the United States tramples on the language of the Court’s order last month, and practically demands the Court’s rebuke.”

#

Resources:

CAC “friend of the court” brief on behalf of Members of Congress in Trump v. Hawaii: https://www.theusconstitution.org/sites/default/files/briefs/Hawaii_v_Trump_Merits_Amicus_Final.pdf

“Muslim travel ban 2.0: just as unconstitutional as version 1.0,” Elizabeth Wydra, Richmond Times-Dispatch, May 30, 2017: http://www.richmond.com/opinion/their-opinion/guest-columnists/eilzabeth-wydra-column-muslim-travel-ban-just-as-unconstitutional-as/article_c28f22d8-5d98-5c6e-9c2c-c3b662f77291.html 

##

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

###

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Nairne v. Landry

In Nairne v. Landry, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the Voting Rights Act’s prohibition on vote dilution is a constitutional exercise of Congress’s Fifteenth Amendment enforcement power.
Voting Rights and Democracy
 

United States v. Paxton

In United States v. Paxton, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the Materiality Provision in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits states from denying the right...
Voting Rights and Democracy
 

Mi Familia Vota v. Petersen

In Mi Familia Vota v. Petersen, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is considering whether requiring voters to include their birthplace on voter registration forms violates the Materiality Provision of the...
Rule of Law
 

Iowa v. SEC

In Iowa v. SEC, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is considering the legality of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s new climate-related disclosure requirements.
Rule of Law
 

Chamber of Commerce v. CFPB

In Chamber of Commerce v. CFPB, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering the legality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s update to its Examination Manual clarifying that discrimination may...
Rule of Law
 

Lackey v. Stinnie

In Lackey v. Stinnie, the Supreme Court is considering when a civil rights plaintiff is entitled to attorney’s fees as the “prevailing party” in a case.