Civil and Human Rights

History of the North Dakota Constitution Amicus Brief in Access Independent Health Services Inc., d/b/a Red River Women’s Clinic v. Wrigley

Amicus is the Constitutional Accountability Center, a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the U.S. Constitution’s text and history. The brief argues how the text and history of the North Dakota Constitution compel the conclusion that the Inalienable Rights Clause protects the right to abortion. Inspired by the powerful protections for individual rights in the U.S. Declaration of Independence, North Dakotans adopted a sweeping Inalienable Rights Clause in their state constitution. Amicus then outlines how the text, structure, and history of the North Dakota constitution protects the inalienable and fundamental right to reproductive autonomy.

Local counsel is Rosenquist Law Office.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
March 28, 2025

Debate over transgender rights grows more fraught in new Trump era

The Christian Science Monitor
Actions by the Trump administration have been pushing back on transgender inclusion, amid sharp public...
Civil and Human Rights
March 19, 2025

Viewpoint: The North Dakota Constitution’s protections include reproductive autonomy

North Dakota's Grand Forks Herald
The Court should live up to North Dakota’s history as a state with some of...
By: Nargis Aslami
Civil and Human Rights
February 27, 2025

What You Should Know About the Right to Protection in the Trump Era

Washington Monthly
The 14th Amendment was meant to enforce the laws equally, not put vulnerable populations in...
By: David H. Gans
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Shilling v. Trump

In Shilling v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington is considering whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional.
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Talbott v. Trump

In Talbott v. Trump, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia is considering whether Trump’s Executive Order categorically barring transgender persons from serving in the military is unconstitutional. 
Civil and Human Rights
March 28, 2025

Equality and Protection: The Forgotten Meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment

102 Denv. L. Rev. (forthcoming 2025)