Rule of Law

400 Justice Department Alumni Are ‘Disturbed’ Over Whitaker Appointment

Acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker has not been formally vetted by the Senate for conflicts of interest.

More than 400 former Department of Justice employees have signed a letter stating they are “disturbed” by President Donald Trump’s pick for acting attorney general, Matthew Whitaker, and demanding he be formally vetted by the Senate.

Published by the watchdog organization Protect Democracy, the letter features hundreds of career employees who served under both Democratic and Republican administrations, according to the group.

“Because of the profound responsibilities the position entails and the independence it requires, it can only be filled by someone who has been subjected to the strictest scrutiny under the process required by the Constitution,” the letter reads. Its signatories include former senior officials, attorneys and judges, among others.

The White House has defended Whitaker’s appointment, saying he is only serving temporarily. Yet the president is reported to feel “no urgency” in permanently filling the post, a process that requires Senate confirmation.

Whitaker took over for Attorney General Jeff Sessions at Trump’s request in early November, skipping over the obvious choice, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

The attorney, who formerly served as Sessions’ chief of staff, has drawn sharp criticism for publicly speaking in favor of Trump and against the special counsel investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. He now oversees the investigation, which has led to concerns over how he may choose to steer it. Once, Whitaker suggested the budget for the investigation be tightened to prevent it from fulfilling its mission.

“The Attorney General is responsible for ensuring that we are a nation of laws,” the letter reads, “and that every citizen and every government official  —  including the President himself  —  is equally subject to those laws.”

Whitaker faces an avalanche of opposition. Late last month, three sitting senators filed a lawsuit challenging the legitimacy of the appointment with the help of Protect Democracy and the Constitutional Accountability Center, another watchdog group. The move was followed by a request from a coalition of attorneys general from 14 states and the District of Columbia, asking a federal judge to block Whitaker’s appointment.

One attorney, Thomas Goldstein, requested help from the United States Supreme Court.

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Federal judge dismisses Trump classified documents criminal case

Kansas Reflector
MILWAUKEE — The federal classified documents case against former President Donald Trump was dismissed Monday...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Ashley Murray