Today in the News, 3.30.09
- “If the court voids Section 5, it will remove one of the most potent pieces of civil-rights legislation in the government’s arsenal.” The WSJ tells the background story behind Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder, in which the Supreme Court must determine whether Congress acted within its constitutional authority when it reauthorized Section 5, known as the “pre-clearance” provision, of the Voting Rights Act in 2006. (Read CAC’s brief in this case, in support of the United States, to learn why we think it did.)
- “‘The A.B.A., even if it might be somewhat biased, will do a more thoughtful and thorough job than most outside vetters.’” In the NY Times today, Adam Liptak quotes Professor James Lindgrin, author of a study used to support the allegation that the American Bar Association is biased in its vetting of judges, while discussing the organization’s historic and future role in vetting the Obama Administration’s candidates.
- “‘If the Republicans want to filibuster a judge, that is directly contrary to what their political philosophy was, but I guess it’s all subject to change.’” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), quoted in Politico, stirred controversy late last week with remarks about the Bush-Era Supreme Court judicial nominations, stating his aim under President Obama is to put moderates on the Court.
More from
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Nairne v. Landry
In Nairne v. Landry, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the Voting Rights Act’s prohibition on vote dilution is a constitutional exercise of Congress’s Fifteenth Amendment enforcement power.
United States v. Paxton
In United States v. Paxton, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the Materiality Provision in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits states from denying the right...
Mi Familia Vota v. Petersen
In Mi Familia Vota v. Petersen, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is considering whether requiring voters to include their birthplace on voter registration forms violates the Materiality Provision of the...
Iowa v. SEC
In Iowa v. SEC, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is considering the legality of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s new climate-related disclosure requirements.
Chamber of Commerce v. CFPB
In Chamber of Commerce v. CFPB, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering the legality of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s update to its Examination Manual clarifying that discrimination may...
Lackey v. Stinnie
In Lackey v. Stinnie, the Supreme Court is considering when a civil rights plaintiff is entitled to attorney’s fees as the “prevailing party” in a case.