Civil and Human Rights

The Road from Lincoln to Obama

In November, Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) joined the American Constitution Society (ACS) in hosting The Second Founding and the Reconstruction Amendments: Toward a More Perfect Union, a two-day conference celebrating the importance of the post-Civil War Amendments in realizing our Constitution’s progressive promise. In keeping with the congressionally-declared theme of the upcoming inauguration, “the new birth of freedom,” we are bringing the message of the Second Founding back to Washington, hosting a pre-inaugural panel laying out a potential legal agenda for the incoming Obama Administration that would bring these Amendments back into constitutional focus.

On Wednesday, January 14, CAC will join the NAACP Legal Defense Fund (NAACP LDF), the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF), and ACS, in co-sponsoring The Road from Lincoln to Obama: the Constitution and the New Birth of Freedom. This midday panel will feature leading historians, constitutional law experts, and civil rights leaders discussing how the “new birth of freedom” took form in the Civil War Amendments, how those Amendments have been interpreted (and in some cases misinterpreted) since their ratification, and how their promise can be better fulfilled today.

CAC Founder and President Doug Kendall will speak at this event, along with John Payton of NAACP LDF, John Trasviña of MALDEF and historians Eric Foner and Mary Frances Berry. Doug will provide an overview of how the Supreme Court has often departed from the Second Founders’ vision of the way in which liberty and equality should be protected through the Fourteenth Amendment. In particular, he will discuss the need to revive the Privileges or Immunities Clause, the original centerpiece of the Fourteenth Amendment that was effectively written out of the Constitution by the Supreme Court in the 1870s. Doug and the other panelists will also address the Supreme Court’s unjustifiable efforts to limit Congress’ ability to enforce the Civil War Amendments. The relevance of this point was vividly illustrated last week, when the Supreme Court granted review in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. Mukasey (08-322), a critical Voting Rights Act case that will test whether the Supreme Court will respect Congress’ authority to prevent racial discrimination in voting.

Registration for this event is free and open to the public. Further details, including where to register, are available here.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
January 13, 2025

CAC RELEASE: At Stanley Oral Argument, Questioning Focuses on Narrow Ground for Resolving Employment Discrimination Case in Favor of a Retiree with a Disability

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Stanley v....
Civil and Human Rights
December 30, 2024

Top Contributor Essays of 2024

The Regulatory Review
The Regulatory Review is pleased to revisit our top regulatory essays of 2024, each authored by...
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2024

Podcast (We the People): Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?

National Constitution Center
A Tennessee law prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender transition surgery and hormone therapy. Professor Kurt...
Civil and Human Rights
December 4, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court Should Not Turn Equal Protection Clause on its Head in Case about Medical Care for Transgender Adolescents

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in United States...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District

In Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether lost educational opportunities are compensable under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Stanley v. City of Sanford

In Stanley v. City of Sanford, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Americans with Disabilities Act protects against disability discrimination with respect to retirement benefits distributed after employment.