Senate Judiciary Subcommittee Examines the War on Voting

Yesterday afternoon, the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights held a hearing on “New State Voting Laws: Barriers to the Ballots,” examining the spate of new voting laws passed throughout the Nation making it harder for Americans to exercise one of our most precious constitutional rights — the right to vote.   In what has been called a “war on voting,” new state laws have imposed new burdensome restrictions on the right of groups, such as the League of Women Voters, to conduct voter registration drives, required voters to present particular types of government-issued photo identification, and cut back on periods for early voting, threatening the right to vote of many American citizens, including members of the military, members of religious orders, college students, African Americans, Hispanics, and the elderly.

Constitutional Accountability Center submitted testimony for this hearing discussing the text and history of the Constitution’s numerous Amendments protecting the right to vote.  At the hearing, the Senators picked up on this constitutional text and history in chronicling the arc of our constitutional progress toward a democracy committed to the full promise of “government of the people, by the people, and for the people.”  Opening the hearing, Subcommittee Chairman Senator Richard Durbin observed that “our Constitution has been amended more to expand and protect the right than for any other issue.  Six Constitutional Amendments – the 15th, 17th, 19th, 23rd, 24th,  and 26th – ratified over the course of 100 years, underscore our nation’s commitment to ensuring  that all adult citizens enjoy full and free access to the ballot.”  Senator Durbin chronicled the history of these Amendments, describing how “courageous Americans fought . . .  to guarantee the right to vote to all citizens – regardless of race, sex, class, or income, or state of residency.”  In a written statement, Senator Patrick Leahy, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, also emphasized our constitutional progress toward securing the right to vote to all citizens, without regard to race, sex, age, or class.  “Our founding document begins with ‘We the People.’  Successive generations of Americans have come together to amend our Constitution six times to expand the participation of its citizenry in the election of the government–to former slaves, to women, to young people, to include the direct election of Senators, and to prohibit poll taxes. In this way, ‘We the People’ have reiterated and affirmed the fundamental importance of the right to vote.”

As the Senators pointed out, new efforts by states to suppress the right to vote — many now under review in courts and by the Department of Justice — are at war with our Constitution’s text and history.  Laws that shut down voter registration drives and disenfranchise American citizens violate the Constitution’s guarantee of the right to vote, a right at the core of our Constitution’s protection of equal citizenship for all Americans.

More from

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes