Another Year of Voting Rights Protection

Today marks the 44th anniversary of the day President Lyndon B. Johnson signed one of our nation’s most important pieces of civil rights legislation into law: the Voting Rights Act of 1965. With the passage of this Act, which outlawed discriminatory voting laws and established federal oversight of election practices in jurisdictions with a history of racial discrimination in voting, Congress fulfilled the promise of the Fifteenth Amendment’s fundamental guarantee that the right of citizens to vote shall not be “denied or abridged,” ratified by We the People nearly a century earlier.

The Voting Rights Act is widely viewed as one of the most successful pieces of civil rights legislation in our nation’s history, having brought an end to the “Jim Crow” era of systemic, codified disenfranchisement of African-Americans in the United States. Yale Law Professor Akhil Amar recently called the Act “one of the most important statutes in world history.”

Despite this recognition, however, and despite abundant evidence the Act is still working to guard against re-encroachment of voting disenfranchisement, the Voting Rights Act is currently in peril. In June, in its decision in the NAMUDNO case, the Supreme Court came dangerously close to striking down a critical portion of the Act, casting doubt on the constitutionality of Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize the provision for another 25 years. As we discussed in our “friend of the court” brief with the Court in that case, and our associated report entitled The Shield of National Protection, the text and history of the Fifteenth Amendment clearly gives Congress broad authority to enforce protection of the right to vote through “appropriate legislation” such as the Voting Rights Act, and its decision to reauthorize the Act should therefore be left in place.

Let’s hope on this historic day – on which the Senate confirmed the first Latina Supreme Court justice, nominated by the first African-American president of the United States – our leaders in Congress and on the Supreme Court can take a moment to acknowledge the enormous accomplishments of this iconic statute, as well as the need to preserve its protections for another generation of Americans.

More from

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes