Criminal Law
Van de Kamp v. Goldstein
Case Summary
On January 26, 2009 the Supreme Court issued a ruling in favor of the prosecutors in Van de Kamp v. Goldstein, a case that addressed whether prosecutors have absolute immunity from liability for failing to provide criminal defendants with constitutionally-required exculpatory information. Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) filed an amicus brief in this case in support of the respondent, Thomas Lee Goldstein, who spent 24 years in prison after he was wrongfully convicted of murder based on the false testimony of a self-interested jailhouse informant.
Case Timeline
-
September 5, 2008
CAC files a merits stage amicus brief in the Supreme Court
Supreme Court Merits Stage Amicus Brief
More from Criminal Law
February 25, 2025
June 5, 2024
SCOTUS debates a death-row inmate’s request for DNA testing
WASHINGTON — In 1998, Ruben Gutierrez and two others were arrested after 85-year-old Escolastica Harrison...
U.S. Supreme Court
Barnes v. Felix
In Barnes v. Felix, the Supreme Court is considering whether a police officer’s use of deadly force should be judged in light of all the circumstances of the incident, or whether courts should ignore unreasonable...
November 6, 2024
TV (CBC): CAC’s Wydra Joins CBC to Discuss Trump’s Criminal Cases
Why Americans Have a Right to Trial by Jury
John Adams said the right to a trial by jury, along with representative government, serve...
May 30, 2024
RELEASE: Jury in NY Finds Trump Guilty on 34 Felony Counts, Ensuring that No One is Above the Law
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s felony conviction in Manhattan of former President Donald Trump...
May 29, 2024