Donald Trump facing lawsuit from almost 200 Democrats claiming he violated US constitution

‘Trump has conflicts of interest in at least 25 countries, and it appears he’s using his presidency to maximise his profits,’ says Michigan congressman John Conyers

By Shehab Khan

Almost 200 Democratic members of the US congress are suing Donald Trump, claiming he has violated a clause of the US Constitution. 

The 196 politicians have alleged that by retaining interests in a global business empire, the US President has violated constitutional restrictions on taking gifts and benefits from foreign leaders.

The lawsuit has already drawn more congressional plaintiffs than any legal action previously taken against a president. 

Leading the legal effort was Michigan congressman John Conyers.

“Trump has conflicts of interest in at least 25 countries, and it appears he’s using his presidency to maximise his profits,” he said.

The 37-page congressional complaint contends that America’s founders were concerned that foreign powers could interfere with the country’s affairs.

They were particularly worried that “foreign states would give benefits and rewards to the nation’s chief executive to subvert his loyalty,” it says. 

As a result, they wrote the emoluments clause of the Constitution with language “both sweeping and unqualified,” it adds. 

      The language of that clause is widely interpreted as prohibiting any officeholder, including the president, from accepting a gift, payment or other benefit from a foreign state without the consent of Congress.

      News of the lawsuit came shortly after a poll revealed almost half of voters are in favour of Mr Trump being impeached.

      A total of 47 per cent of the people surveyed would support him being removed as president, while only 43 per cent would oppose it.

      “Voters have little faith that Donald Trump is telling the truth when it comes to the Russia investigation,” said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling, who conducted the survey.

      “Most go so far as to say they think he is a liar.”

      More from

      Rule of Law
      July 25, 2024

      USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

      CIVICUS
      CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
      By: Praveen Fernandes
      Access to Justice
      July 23, 2024

      Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

      The Regulatory Review
      Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
      By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
      Rule of Law
      July 19, 2024

      US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

      Reuters
      July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
      By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
      Rule of Law
      July 18, 2024

      RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

      WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
      By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
      Rule of Law
      July 17, 2024

      Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

      Bloomberg Law
      Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
      By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
      Rule of Law
      July 15, 2024

      Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

      WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
      By: Praveen Fernandes