Civil and Human Rights
Birth Control Arguments at Supreme Court Find Kennedy Looking for an Out
“As usual in these cases, it really comes down to Kennedy,” David Gans, an attorney at the liberal Constitutional Accountability Center, said after attending the argument. “Kennedy, alone among the conservatives, had critical questions for both sides.”
More from Civil and Human Rights
January 13, 2025
CAC RELEASE: At Stanley Oral Argument, Questioning Focuses on Narrow Ground for Resolving Employment Discrimination Case in Favor of a Retiree with a Disability
WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Stanley v....
December 30, 2024
Top Contributor Essays of 2024
The Regulatory Review is pleased to revisit our top regulatory essays of 2024, each authored by...
December 5, 2024
Podcast (We the People): Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?
A Tennessee law prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender transition surgery and hormone therapy. Professor Kurt...
December 4, 2024
RELEASE: Supreme Court Should Not Turn Equal Protection Clause on its Head in Case about Medical Care for Transgender Adolescents
WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in United States...
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District
In Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether lost educational opportunities are compensable under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
U.S. Supreme Court
Stanley v. City of Sanford
In Stanley v. City of Sanford, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Americans with Disabilities Act protects against disability discrimination with respect to retirement benefits distributed after employment.