Civil and Human Rights

Report: Obama administration to file brief against Prop 8

The Department of Justice will support opponents of California’s gay marriage ban in their SCOTUS case

 

By Jillian Rayfield

 

The Obama Administration will reportedly file a brief in opposition to California’s ban on gay marriage known as Proposition 8.

 

NBC News cited “administration officials” who say that the White House will argue that the Supreme Court should uphold a ruling by a lower court striking down the law, on the grounds that it violates the 14th Amendment.

 

From NBC News:

 

After first suggesting it would not get involved, the Obama Administration will file a friend-of-the-court brief late today in support of the two gay couples who launched the fight over the issue four years ago, the officials said. Today is the last day for filing briefs in support of the couples’ position.

 

The administration last year signaled it might stay on the sidelines. In May, when President Obama first said that “same-sex couples should be able to get married,” he added that it was not a matter for the federal government.

 

The Supreme Court is taking up the case in late March, and will first decide whether supporters of Prop 8 have standing in the case. If they do, the Court will then rule on the merits.

 

The Court is also considering a challenge to the Defense of Marriage Act, the ban on same-sex marriages for the purposes of receiving federal benefits. The Obama Administration announced in February, 2011 that it would no longer defend DOMA in court, but House Republicans elected to continue on with the defense through the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group.

 

On Thursday, thirteen states will also file briefs with the Supreme Court arguing that Prop 8 is unconstitutional. Fifteen will file briefs in opposition to DOMA on Friday. Other groups, like the libertarian Cato Institute and the liberal Constitutional Accountability Center have filed similar briefs this week in opposition to both laws.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
January 13, 2025

CAC RELEASE: At Stanley Oral Argument, Questioning Focuses on Narrow Ground for Resolving Employment Discrimination Case in Favor of a Retiree with a Disability

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Stanley v....
Civil and Human Rights
December 30, 2024

Top Contributor Essays of 2024

The Regulatory Review
The Regulatory Review is pleased to revisit our top regulatory essays of 2024, each authored by...
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2024

Podcast (We the People): Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?

National Constitution Center
A Tennessee law prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender transition surgery and hormone therapy. Professor Kurt...
Civil and Human Rights
December 4, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court Should Not Turn Equal Protection Clause on its Head in Case about Medical Care for Transgender Adolescents

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in United States...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District

In Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether lost educational opportunities are compensable under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Stanley v. City of Sanford

In Stanley v. City of Sanford, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Americans with Disabilities Act protects against disability discrimination with respect to retirement benefits distributed after employment.