Supreme Court denies fast track to Virginia health care lawsuit

 

Politico
Supreme Court denies fast track to Virginia health care lawsuit
By Jennifer Haberkorn
April 25, 2011

 

The Supreme Court has denied Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli’s petition to hear Virginia’s lawsuit against the health care overhaul immediately. The order was released Monday without explanation.

The denial was expected. It’s rare for the high court to take a case without letting it go through the circuit courts first.

It’s even more unusual for the court to take a case early against the wishes of the federal government. The Department of Justice opposed the motion, arguing that the case should follow regular order.

The move means the case will proceed through the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals. Oral arguments are scheduled for May 10.

In a statement, Cuccinelli called the denial “disappointing” but “not surprising,” acknowledging that the Supreme Court rarely expedites cases.

“We asked the United States Supreme Court for expedited review of our lawsuit because Virginia and other states are already spending huge sums to implement their portions of the health care act, businesses are already making decisions about whether to cut or keep employee health plans, and citizens are in limbo until the Supreme Court rules,” Cuccinelli said. “Asking the court to expedite our lawsuit was about removing this crippling and costly uncertainty as quickly as possible. We were gratified that both Republicans and Democrats in Virginia supported the effort to expedite.”

It’s still the first in at least four suits to reach the circuit court level, ensuring that Cuccinelli’s suit could be a strong contender to be the one the Supreme Court takes up — if it takes up any at all.

“This case’s logical end point is the Supreme Court. It will simply have to make its way through the Fourth Circuit first,” Cuccinelli said.

Doug Kendall of the Constitutional Accountability Center, a left-leaning legal action center, argues that the Supreme Court should deny all future requests, too.

“Today’s entirely predictable ruling should be the first of many that denies Supreme Court review,” he said in a statement released minutes after the order was released. “Proponents of this lawsuit have tried to frame it as a hugely important constitutional challenge steamrolling to the Supreme Court. It is, in fact, a nothingburger.”

The order indicated that no justice recused himself or herself from considering whether to take up the case. The move could indicate that the justices don’t anticipate any recusals if and when the court takes up one of the health lawsuits.

More from

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes