Civil and Human Rights

New York Times continues the dialogue on Reconstruction

As the five-year celebration of our Nation’s Second Founding continues, we here at CAC look forward to highlighting the writings of those working to keep our Nation’s post-Civil War history a part of the public dialogue.

Last week, the New York Times dedicated its Room for Debate feature to the question, “How should Americans remember Reconstruction?”

In addition to the estimable Eric Foner, whose work we have previously lauded, the Times assembled a great range of voices for this panel.  Prof. Gregory Downs and Prof. Kate Masur, referring to the period as “the United States’ second founding,” discussed their upcoming partnership with the National Parks Service, while Slate’s Jamelle Bouie revisited episodes of violent voter suppression and murder from the era in a call for a restored Voting Rights Act. The entire feature of eight debaters is well worth the read.

It’s great to see “the newspaper of record” giving this era the continued attention it deserves.

Visit SecondFounding.org to learn more about ongoing celebrations and find further interesting summer reading on this critical period of our Nation’s history.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2024

Podcast (We the People): Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?

National Constitution Center
A Tennessee law prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender transition surgery and hormone therapy. Professor Kurt...
Civil and Human Rights
December 4, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court Should Not Turn Equal Protection Clause on its Head in Case about Medical Care for Transgender Adolescents

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in United States...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District

In Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether lost educational opportunities are compensable under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Stanley v. City of Sanford

In Stanley v. City of Sanford, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Americans with Disabilities Act protects against disability discrimination with respect to retirement benefits distributed after employment. 
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Skrmetti

In United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court is considering whether Tennessee’s ban on providing gender-affirming medical care to transgender adolescents violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Civil and Human Rights
July 31, 2024

Supreme Court Allows Cities to Punish Homelessness

The Regulatory Review
At the end of its 2023-24 term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued several divided decisions...
By: Brian R. Frazelle