Thanks for the Tip, Chief Justice Roberts

Over the weekend, President Obama  announced his intention to fill 15 positions in his Administration using the recess appointment power given to him by Article II of the Constitution, which gives the President the power, while the Senate is in recess,  to fill vacant positions in the Executive and Judicial branches that are otherwise subject to Senate confirmation.   In making this announcement, President Obama explained that the move was needed because Republicans in the Senate have engaged in unprecedented obstructionism in delaying the confirmation of his nominees, preventing key government work from getting done.  Among the positions being filled by recess appointments are two long-standing vacancies on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

Predictably, Republicans have criticized the recess appointments but what they apparently did not notice is that Chief Justice John Roberts himself suggested it last week.  Last Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in New Process Steel v. NLRB, a case asking whether the NLRB has the authority to operate when only two of its five Board positions are filled. The question is a critical one, because the NLRB – whose members are subject to Senate confirmation – currently has three vacancies.  (Think Progress reports that if the Court rules against the NLRB, more than 600 cases it has already decided could be thrown out.)

During oral argument, Deputy Solicitor General Neal Katyal partly attributed the vacancies on the NLRB to obstructionism by Senate Republicans, which prompted the Chief Justice to ask:
And the recess appointment power doesn’t work why?
We couldn’t have said it better ourselves.  Nor, apparently, could President Obama.

Just four days later, the President announced he was making the recess appointments.  In addition to filling two of the NLRB vacancies, the recess appointments will also fill long-standing vacancies in the Departments of Treasury, Commerce, and Homeland Security and in the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, as well as on the Farm Credit Administration Board and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Thanks for the tip, Chief Justice Roberts.

More from

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes