John Payton on Your Constitutional Rights: “The only reason you have any of those rights is there’s a Fourteenth Amendment.”

Earlier this month Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) partnered with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund (LDF), American Constitution Society (ACS), and the Mexican American Legal and Education Defense Fund (MALDEF) in hosting the event, The Road from Lincoln to Obama: the Constitution and the New Birth of Freedom. This midday panel at the National Press Club discussed the importance of reviving the Reconstruction Amendments under the new Obama Administration, and also highlighted the release of CAC’s report, The Gem of the Constitution: The Text and History of the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which explains (among other things) how the Privileges or Immunities Clause was incorrectly written out of the Constitution by the Supreme Court in the 19th-century Slaughterhouse cases.

During the question and answer portion of the panel discussion, John Payton, the President of NAACP LDF and one of the country’s most accomplished civil rights lawyers, discussed The Gem, the reasons for restoring the Privileges or Immunities Clause, and, more generally, the vital importance of the Fourteenth Amendment. His remarks succinctly and powerfully capture the thrust of the work of CAC’s Human and Civil Rights program, and we wanted to share them with you here:

Most of the people in the country would agree with the list of things that Doug [Kendall, CAC’s President] read off, thinking “Gee, we have the following rights…”

The only reason you have any of those rights is there’s a Fourteenth Amendment. You can’t find them in the Constitution as drafted. You just can’t find them. You can see that, “Gee, the federal government can’t do these things…” but that’s not the question. The question is whether any government can do those things.

And the only way we have those things we now see as national rights is that the Fourteenth Amendment has “incorporated” (that’s the phrasing that all the lawyers now use) those rights.

The question that Doug raises is: Was that a cramped way of getting to incorporation — through the due process clause, and substantive due process? Wasn’t it drafted with a much more open door, which is Privileges or Immunities?

If you read the history, these rights were supposed to come in as Privileges or Immunities of being a citizen of the United States. The reason we are stuck in this funny hole, is [because cases like Slaughterhouse did] what was required if you want to destroy Reconstruction.

We’re way past that. We’re way past that. The historians have actually figured it out. They write the right history now. But we’re stuck with these ridiculous cases, where we have a parade of cases that say things that, when you read them, and you read the context, you want to start laughing. But they’re still precedent.

Payton was referring to recent and widely-acclaimed scholarship regarding the drafting and ratification history of the Fourteenth Amendment, which demonstrates that the Amendment’s framers intended for the Privileges or Immunities Clause to be the Constitution’s main guarantor of fundamental rights and liberties. For more on the Privileges or Immunities Clause, download our report here. To watch the entire Road from Lincoln to Obama event click here.

More from

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes