Federal Courts and Nominations

A Debate on “The Dirty Dozen”: The Worst Supreme Court Cases in the Modern Era?

Details

Tuesday, July 15, 2008
3:45 pm
American Constitution Society

Released in May 2008, The Dirty Dozen: How Twelve Supreme Court Cases Radically Expanded Government and Eroded Freedom analyzes what co-authors Robert Levy of the Cato Institute and William Mellor of the Institute for Justice view as the worst U.S. Supreme Court decisions in the modern era. The authors include cases on a wide range of topics including interstate commerce, affirmative action, economic rights, and campaign finance. The book has contributed to an energetic, wide-reaching debate about the Supreme Court, generating an extensive range of opinions among legal professionals, concerned non-lawyers, and Court followers about the impact of the cases discussed and the role of the Court. The American Constitution Society and The Cato Institute were pleased to provide a public platform for this important debate. Leading practitioners and academics from different perspectives discussed the book and debated whether the cases selected by the author are in fact the twelve worst cases in recent times.

The debate featured:

  • David Barron, Professor of Law, Harvard Law School
  • Doug Kendall, Founder and President, Constitutional Accountability Center
  • William Mellor, Co-Author of “The Dirty Dozen”; President and General Counsel, Institute for Justice
  • Ilya Shapiro, Senior Fellow in Constitutional Studies and Editor-in-Chief of the Cato Supreme Court Review, Cato Institute
  • Moderator, Amanda Frost, Assistant Professor of Law, American University Washington College of Law

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Federal Courts and Nominations
November 15, 2024

Sign On Letter: 140+ National Organizations Urge Senators to Confirm All Pending Judicial Nominees

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
November 9, 2024

Trump has shaped the Supreme Court, but it could still hinder his agenda

NBC News
Although the court has three Trump appointees as part of its 6-3 conservative majority, it...
Federal Courts and Nominations
January 17, 2024

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights Sign-On Letter Prioritizing Diverse Judges

Dear Senator, On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and the...
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 31, 2023

Liberal justices earn praise for ‘independence’ on Supreme Court, but Thomas truly stands alone, expert says

Fox News
Some democrats compare Justice Clarence Thomas to ‘Uncle Tom’ and house slave in ‘Django Unchained’
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, By Brianna Herlihy
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 7, 2023

In Her First Term, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson ‘Came to Play’

The New York Times
From her first week on the Supreme Court bench in October to the final day...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, by Adam Liptak
Federal Courts and Nominations
July 8, 2023

The Supreme Court’s continuing march to the right

CNN
Major legal rulings that dismantled the use of race in college admissions, undermined protections for...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, by Tierney Sneed