Civil and Human Rights

McDonald v. Chicago: The Case and the 2nd Amendment

Details

Monday, April 5, 2010
4:00 pm
American Constitution Society

On March 2, 2010, the Supreme Court heard arguments for McDonald v. City of Chicago, on the issue of whether—and, if so, how—the Constitution protects against state infringement of the individual right to keep and bear arms recognized by the Court last year in District of Columbia v. Heller. While the case has largely been billed as a Second Amendment case, it could have broad implications for individual rights, including strengthening the foundation of cases like Roe v. Wade and Lawrence v. Texas.

The panel will feature guests Joshua Horwitz, Executive Director of the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, Elizabeth Wydra, Chief Counsel of Constitutional Accountability Center, and Alan Gura, of Gura Possessky, who is the lead attorney for McDonald and argued the case before the Supreme Court. The panel will be moderated by Maryland Law Professor Richard Boldt.

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
January 13, 2025

CAC RELEASE: At Stanley Oral Argument, Questioning Focuses on Narrow Ground for Resolving Employment Discrimination Case in Favor of a Retiree with a Disability

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Stanley v....
Civil and Human Rights
December 30, 2024

Top Contributor Essays of 2024

The Regulatory Review
The Regulatory Review is pleased to revisit our top regulatory essays of 2024, each authored by...
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2024

Podcast (We the People): Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?

National Constitution Center
A Tennessee law prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender transition surgery and hormone therapy. Professor Kurt...
Civil and Human Rights
December 4, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court Should Not Turn Equal Protection Clause on its Head in Case about Medical Care for Transgender Adolescents

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in United States...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District

In Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether lost educational opportunities are compensable under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Stanley v. City of Sanford

In Stanley v. City of Sanford, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Americans with Disabilities Act protects against disability discrimination with respect to retirement benefits distributed after employment.