Voting Rights and Democracy
Shelby County v. Holder: Contemplating the Federal Government’s Continuing Role in Protecting Civil Rights in the States
Lawyers and law students alike gathered for a panel discussion about the controversial case Shelby County v. Holder, which will be argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on February 27th. The issue in this case is whether Congressional re-authorization of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which requires certain states to submit changes to election practices and procedures for review by the federal government in order to prevent discriminatory voting laws, is constitutional. Those who challenge the law argue that the re-authorization exceeds Congressional authority under the Fifteenth Amendment, in violation of the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.
Featuring:
- Natasha Korgaonkar, Assistant Counsel, Political Participation Group, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
- Jerry Vattamala, Staff Attorney, Democracy Program, Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund
- Elizabeth B. Wydra, Chief Counsel, Constitutional Accountability Center
- Erika L. Wood, Associate Professor of Law, New York Law School
- Ekow N. Yankah, Professor of Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
And moderated by:
- Ari Berman, Writer, The Nation; Investigative Journalism Fellow, The Nation Institute
More from Voting Rights and Democracy
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Nairne v. Landry
In Nairne v. Landry, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the Voting Rights Act’s prohibition on vote dilution is a constitutional exercise of Congress’s Fifteenth Amendment enforcement power.
United States v. Paxton
In United States v. Paxton, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is considering whether the Materiality Provision in the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits states from denying the right...
Mi Familia Vota v. Petersen
In Mi Familia Vota v. Petersen, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is considering whether requiring voters to include their birthplace on voter registration forms violates the Materiality Provision of the...
May 24, 2024
Voting Rights Experts Find Old Ideas in New Racial Gerrymandering Standard
WASHINGTON (CN) — Seven years ago, Justice Samuel Alito lamented his colleagues' refusal to create...
May 24, 2024
This Supreme Court Term Was All About Undoing Democracy
In the coming weeks, the Supreme Court will wrap up a consequential term and issue decisions...
May 23, 2024
RELEASE: Supreme Court’s Conservative Majority Upholds Racial Gerrymander and Strikes a Severe Blow to Our Constitution’s Promise of a Multiracial Democracy
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Alexander v. The South...