Rule of Law

RELEASE: Justices Reject Tenth Amendment Challenges to ICWA and Confirm Supremacy of Federal Law

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s announcement of its decision this morning in Haaland v. Brackeen and consolidated cases in which the Supreme Court was considering the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), a 1978 law passed to prevent state courts from unnecessarily separating Indian families and communities using state adoption and foster care systems, Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh issued the following reaction:

In a victory for tribal sovereignty, the Supreme Court rejected a broad set of constitutional challenges to ICWA.  Among other things, the Court held that the law does not violate the Supreme Court’s anti-commandeering doctrine.  Consistent with the constitutional history laid out in CAC’s amicus brief in the case, the Court rejected the argument that Congress runs afoul of an anti-commandeering prohibition when it makes rules that apply in state courts, as ICWA’s rules do.  “This argument,” Justice Barrett explained, “runs headlong into the Constitution.”

The Court also rejected the challengers’ argument that ICWA’s recordkeeping provisions violate the Tenth Amendment.  Echoing CAC’s brief, the Court held that these requirements related to state court proceedings are entirely consistent with the kinds of obligations that Congress has imposed on state actors since the Founding.

Significantly, today’s decision preserves ICWA, which plays an important role in protecting tribal citizenship.  It does something else important as well: it ensures that Congress has the power to create standards that state courts must follow, consistent with the constitutional system that the Framers put in place.

##

Resources:

Case page in Haaland v. Brackeen: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/haaland-v-brackeen/

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Federal judge dismisses Trump classified documents criminal case

Kansas Reflector
MILWAUKEE — The federal classified documents case against former President Donald Trump was dismissed Monday...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Ashley Murray