Rule of Law

RELEASE: Statutory Text and History Make Clear that the Student Debt Relief Plan Is Authorized by the HEROES Act, Constitutional Accountability Center Amicus Brief on Behalf of Former Representative George Miller Argues

WASHINGTON, DC – Earlier today, the Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) filed a brief at the Supreme Court on behalf of former Representative George Miller in Biden v. Nebraska and Department of Education v. Brown in support of the government’s student debt relief plan. Representative Miller was one of the chief architects of the HEROES Act of 2003, and the brief explains that the debt relief plan is a lawful exercise of the Education Secretary’s authority under that Act because it gives the Secretary broad authority to respond to national emergencies like the COVID-19 pandemic.
CAC Appellate Counsel Smita Ghosh said:

In response to an unprecedented global pandemic, and relying on authority Congress gave the Education Secretary in the HEROES Act, the Education Secretary put in place a debt relief plan that reflected the breadth of the economic hardship created by COVID-19. Those now challenging this plan argue that Congress did not give the Secretary the authority to relieve student debt in this way, but Representative George Miller, one of the chief architects of the HEROES Act, disagrees. As our brief, which was filed on Rep. Miller’s behalf, explains, the HEROES Act gives the Education Secretary significant authority to ease the burdens on borrowers who have been affected by unexpected national emergencies. This statutory authority has been exercised by administrations of both political parties, including by the Trump administration.

##
Resources:
##
Constitutional Accountability Center is a nonpartisan think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text, history, and values. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.
###

More from Rule of Law

Rule of Law
July 2, 2024

RADIO/PODCAST (Bloomberg): Elizabeth Wydra Discusses Presidential Immunity Ruling

Bloomberg
Elizabeth Wydra, Constitutional Accountability Center President & Supreme Court Litigator, discusses the latest developments in...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, Joe Mathieu, Kailey Leinz
Rule of Law
July 2, 2024

‘Originalism is a dead letter’: Supreme Court majority accused of abandoning legal principles in Trump immunity ruling

NBC News
Critics on the left and the right said the decision finding absolute immunity for certain...
By: Smita Ghosh, Lawrence Hurley
Rule of Law
 

Garland v. VanDerStok

In Garland v. VanDerStok, the Supreme Court is considering whether weapon parts kits and incomplete frames and receivers should be regulated as “firearms” under the Gun Control Act.
Rule of Law
July 1, 2024

RELEASE: High Court’s Decision on Presidential Immunity Is Too Little and Too Late to Ensure the Framers’ Vision of Presidential Accountability

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Trump v. United States,...
By: Praveen Fernandes, Smita Ghosh
Rule of Law
July 30, 2024

She cemented a conservative Supreme Court, but a ‘cautious’ Justice Barrett sometimes resists the far-right flank

NBC News
In several recent cases, the Trump appointee has written opinions criticizing conservative colleagues and has...
By: Elizabeth B. Wydra, Lawrence Hurley
Rule of Law
June 28, 2024

RELEASE: In Flagrant Judicial Power Grab, Court Discards Chevron Doctrine, Undermining Congress and Agencies, and Threatening Government Programs that Protect Americans

WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Loper Bright Enterprises v....
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen