Civil and Human Rights

RELEASE: If Constitutional Text and History Are the Guides, Roe Should be Upheld

WASHINGTON – Following oral argument today at the U.S. Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, over whether Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban is unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment and the landmark precedents Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction: 

Let there be no confusion: the Constitution protects the right to abortion in every state. To the extent that conservative justices suggested that the Court must remain “neutral” with respect to abortion regulations, they are wrong for the simple reason that the Constitution itself is not neutral when it comes to protecting fundamental rights, including bodily autonomy and reproductive liberty.

What shouldn’t be lost in today’s arguments is the first principle that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal citizenship to all in America. It is a promise forged in the aftermath of the Civil War to, in part, combat the evils of chattel slavery. Against this horror—when people were forbidden to form families of their own, and enslaved women were treated as “object[s] to be raped, bred, or abused” and were forced to bear children and watch those children be sold—the Reconstruction Framers drafted the Fourteenth Amendment to be “the Declaration of Independence placed immutably and forever in our Constitution.” Denying people their bodily integrity and autonomy, however—as Mississippi’s abortion ban does—betrays the Fourteenth Amendment’s text and history and denies the promise of equal citizenship that it makes to all Americans.

#

Resources:

CAC case page in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: https://www.theusconstitution.org/litigation/dobbs-v-jackson-womens-health-organization/

“No, Really, Roe Is Supported by the Text and History of the Constitution,” David Gans, The Atlantic, November 1, 2021: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/11/roe-was-originalist-reading-constitution/620600/

CAC #PurpleChairChat, “Abortion Rights: What’s at Stake?” (online conversation between CAC President Elizabeth Wydra and Sister Song Executive Director Monica Simpson), October 28, 2021: https://www.theusconstitution.org/blog/abortion-rights-whats-at-stake/

“The Mississippi Abortion Case Threatens the Right to Use Birth Control, Marry, and Even Make Choices About Sex,” David Gans, Slate, October 12, 2021: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2021/10/mississippi-abortion-birth-control-lgbtq-scotus.html

##

Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit CAC’s website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Civil and Human Rights

Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2024

Podcast (We the People): Can Tennessee Ban Medical Transitions for Transgender Minors?

National Constitution Center
A Tennessee law prohibits transgender minors from receiving gender transition surgery and hormone therapy. Professor Kurt...
Civil and Human Rights
December 4, 2024

RELEASE: Supreme Court Should Not Turn Equal Protection Clause on its Head in Case about Medical Care for Transgender Adolescents

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in United States...
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District

In Payan v. Los Angeles Community College District, the Ninth Circuit is considering whether lost educational opportunities are compensable under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act. 
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

Stanley v. City of Sanford

In Stanley v. City of Sanford, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Americans with Disabilities Act protects against disability discrimination with respect to retirement benefits distributed after employment. 
Civil and Human Rights
U.S. Supreme Court

United States v. Skrmetti

In United States v. Skrmetti, the Supreme Court is considering whether Tennessee’s ban on providing gender-affirming medical care to transgender adolescents violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Civil and Human Rights
July 31, 2024

Supreme Court Allows Cities to Punish Homelessness

The Regulatory Review
At the end of its 2023-24 term, the U.S. Supreme Court issued several divided decisions...
By: Brian R. Frazelle