Immigration and Citizenship

RELEASE: Conservative Justices Abdicate Duty to Check President’s Unconstitutional Anti-Muslim Animus

Chief Justice Roberts hears no evil, Justice Kennedy sees no evil, and Justice Gorsuch says no evil in the face of the president who appointed him, who as a candidate proudly and loudly called for “a complete and total shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.”

WASHINGTON—On news this morning that the U.S. Supreme Court issued its ruling in Hawaii v. Trump, upholding President Donald Trump’s Muslim travel ban as lawful, Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra issued the following reaction:

The Framers of America’s Constitution established the courts, in part, to be a check on the political branches of our government. To pull them back into line when they stray from founding principles and the letter of our laws and speak with the voice of the final authority on what our Constitution means.

Today, five conservative justices set this grave duty aside and instead gave license to the worst impulses of a president who has made no secret of his racial, ethnic, and religious prejudice against people who identify as Muslims. Rather than heed the words of James Madison, who said “the Religion … of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man,” today five conservative justices—some of whom have the chutzpah to call themselves originalists—instead chose to bury their heads in the sand rather than follow the clear import of the Constitution’s text and history. Chief Justice Roberts hears no evil, Justice Kennedy sees no evil, and Justice Gorsuch says no evil in the face of the president who appointed him, who as a candidate proudly and loudly called for “a complete and total shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.”

Justice Sotomayor summed up today’s abdication of the court’s duty perfectly today, writing, “Our Constitution demands, and our country deserves, a Judiciary willing to hold the coordinate branches to account when they defy our most sacred legal commitments. [T]he Court’s decision today has failed in that respect.”

#

Resources:

CAC’s brief on behalf of Members of Congress explaining by President Trump’s Muslim travel ban violates the Constitution and Immigration and Nationality Act: https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Trump_v_Hawaii_Cert_Amicus_Final.pdf

##

Now in our tenth year, Constitutional Accountability Center is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history. Visit the new CAC website at www.theusconstitution.org.

###

More from Immigration and Citizenship

Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

United States v. Smith

In United States v. Smith, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering whether the Fourth Amendment permits law enforcement officers—without a warrant or probable cause—to search and copy the contents...
Immigration and Citizenship
September 10, 2024

Trump, Vance y estos congresistas latinos quieren acabar con la ciudadanía por nacimiento. ¿Pueden hacerlo?

Telemundo
Quien nace en territorio estadounidense es considerado ciudadano por la Constitución desde hace 156 años....
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Texas v. Department of Homeland Security

In Texas v. Department of Homeland Security, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit is hearing a challenge to the Department of Homeland Security’s programs for parole for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and...
Immigration and Citizenship
June 3, 2024

Improper DHS Appointment Voids Asylum Rule, Groups Argue

Law360
Law360 (June 3, 2024, 8:43 PM EDT) -- Two immigrant advocacy groups suing the federal...
By: Brian R. Frazelle, Ali Sullivan
Immigration and Citizenship
June 23, 2023

RELEASE: Supreme Court Decision Allows Administration to Prioritize Certain Noncitizens for Immigration Enforcement, as Presidential Administrations Have Done for Decades

WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s announcement of its decision this morning in United...
By: Smita Ghosh
Immigration and Citizenship
January 17, 2023

RELEASE: Supreme Court Considers Access to Courts for Asylum-Seekers

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Santos-Zacaria v....
By: Smita Ghosh