Federal Courts and Nominations

While Acclaiming Srinivasan, Senate Republicans Propose A Mass Filibuster By Another Name

Washington, DC – Following the hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee this afternoon for Srikanth (“Sri”) Srinivasan, nominated by President Obama to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, Constitutional Accountability Center President Doug Kendall released the following reaction:

 

“Sri Srinivasan’s testimony today demonstrates why prominent lawyers from across the ideological spectrum have advocated his confirmation by acclaim. He rightly celebrated the ‘genius’ of the Constitution and its ‘enduring , fixed quality.’ In fact, several Senators questioned rhetorically how anyone could oppose this nomination.

 

“It is disappointing, however, that Senate Republicans would use his hearing primarily to recycle tired arguments about the workload of the DC Circuit that they rejected when President Bush was nominating judges. The legislation they proposed today is just a smokescreen to justify a future blockade of any nominees – however qualified – to this critical court. This legislation is just a mass filibuster by another name.”

 

#

 

Resources:

 

“Let’s Try This Again – Judiciary Committee Hearing for Srinivasan the Next Step to Fixing the D.C. Circuit,” April 3, 2013: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/1940/let%E2%80%99s-try-again-%E2%80%93-judiciary-committee-hearing-srinivasan-next-step-fixing-dc  

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

 

More from Federal Courts and Nominations

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes