Access to Justice

In Clapper, Supreme Court Majority Turns Article III On Its Head

Washington, DC – On news that the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its decision in Clapper v. Amnesty International USA, which tossed out of court a First Amendment challenge to a law establishing a secretive surveillance program on the basis that there was no proof of precisely who the government secretly targeted, Constitutional Accountability Center released the following reaction:

 

Rochelle Bobroff, Director of CAC’s Access to Courts Program, said, “The Supreme Court majority goes through a series of contortions in order to deny Amnesty International and others the ability to challenge the constitutionality of this controversial surveillance program, making it unlikely that anyone will ever be able to mount such a challenge.  The court’s ruling relies on Article III of the Constitution, but turns it on its head, misinterpreting the Court’s role to hear important constitutional cases into a license to deny review.”

 

CAC Chief Counsel Elizabeth Wydra added, “The Court’s embrace of an overly restrictive ‘certainly impending’ standard will make it more difficult for litigants to access our federal courts, whether they are challenging a federal statute or seeking to hold a company liable for violating federal law.” 

 

#

 

Resources:

 

Constitutional Accountability Center’s “friend of the court” brief filed on the side of Respondents: http://www.scribd.com/doc/107052852/CAC-Clapper-Amicus  

 

“Clapper and the Constitutional Role of the Federal Judiciary,” Rochelle Bobroff, October 25, 2012: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/1661/clapper-and-constitutional-role-federal-judiciary  

 

Clapper v. Amnesty International USA: Supreme Court to Resolve Key Court Access Issue In First Amendment Case,” Rochelle Bobroff, September 26, 2012: http://theusconstitution.org/text-history/1629/clapper-v-amnesty-international-usa-supreme-court-resolve-key-court-access-issue  

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from Access to Justice

Rule of Law
July 25, 2024

USA: ‘The framers of the constitution envisioned an accountable president, not a king above the law’

CIVICUS
CIVICUS discusses the recent US Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact...
By: Praveen Fernandes
Access to Justice
July 23, 2024

Bissonnette and the Future of Federal Arbitration

The Regulatory Review
Every year, there are a handful of Supreme Court cases that do not make headlines...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 19, 2024

US Supreme Court is making it harder to sue – even for conservatives

Reuters
July 19 (Reuters) - Over its past two terms, the U.S. Supreme Court has put an end...
By: David H. Gans, Andrew Chung
Rule of Law
July 18, 2024

RELEASE: Sixth Circuit Panel Grapples with Effect of Supreme Court’s Loper Bright Decision on Title X Regulation

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen
Rule of Law
July 17, 2024

Family Planning Fight Poised to Test Scope of Chevron Rollback

Bloomberg Law
Justices made clear prior Chevron-based decisions would stand Interpretations of ambiguous laws no longer given deference...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, Mary Anne Pazanowski
Rule of Law
July 15, 2024

Not Above the Law Coalition On Judge Cannon Inappropriately Dismissing Classified Documents Case Against Trump

WASHINGTON — Today, following reports that Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed the classified documents case against...
By: Praveen Fernandes