WASHINGTON, DC -- “Today’s decision by the Supreme Court to hear McDonald v. City of Chicago is about more than guns: it is about whether the Court will restore the precise constitutional text that requires states to honor the fundamental rights of all Americans. At issue is not only whether the Second Amendment right to bear arms is incorporated against state action through the Fourteenth Amendment, but how.
You are here
January, 2010
January 12, 2010
“The Supreme Court backed one step away from a very steep cliff today when it avoided a constitutional challenge to a central part of the Voting Rights Act (VRA). However, the Court remained close to the edge, wrongly opining that the VRA raises ‘serious constitutional questions,’ setting up a future challenge to the Act. In fact, as Constitutional Accountability Center lays out in a brief in NAMUDNO and in our new report, The Shield of National Protection, the text and history of the Civil War Amendments give Congress broad power to secure liberty, equality and the ri
Articles & Commentary
Duh, it is president's job to nominate judges: Column
USA Today
June 12, 2013
Doug Kendall
Constitution’s history supports affirmative action
Austin American-Statesman
June 2, 2013
David H. Gans
How to judge the Supreme Court’s upcoming equality rulings
Yahoo News
May 31, 2013
Doug Kendall, David H. Gans
Letters: It's Not Packing, Just Filling the D.C. Bench
Wall Street Journal
May 24, 2013
Judith E. Schaeffer
Scalia vs. Roberts
Slate
May 24, 2013
Doug Kendall, Tom Donnelly
View All Articles & Commentary
Posts from Text & History
June 18, 2013
June 14, 2013
