Criminal Law
Van de Kamp v. Goldstein
Case Summary
On January 26, 2009 the Supreme Court issued a ruling in favor of the prosecutors in Van de Kamp v. Goldstein, a case that addressed whether prosecutors have absolute immunity from liability for failing to provide criminal defendants with constitutionally-required exculpatory information. Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC) filed an amicus brief in this case in support of the respondent, Thomas Lee Goldstein, who spent 24 years in prison after he was wrongfully convicted of murder based on the false testimony of a self-interested jailhouse informant.
Case Timeline
-
September 5, 2008
CAC files a merits stage amicus brief in the Supreme Court
Supreme Court Merits Stage Amicus Brief
More from Criminal Law
May 28, 2026
CAC Release: Supreme Court Recognizes Clear Pathway to Habeas Relief in Mississippi Jury Race-Discrimination Case
WASHINGTON, DC – Following today’s decision at the Supreme Court in Pitchford v. Cain, a...
May 28, 2026
CAC Release: Supreme Court Majority Rules that Judges Cannot Consider Changing Views of Crime when Reducing Sentences
WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision this morning in Rutherford v. United States...
May 28, 2026
CAC Release: Court’s Commitment to Text and History Falters in Compassionate Release Case
WASHINGTON, DC – Following the Supreme Court’s decision in Fernandez v. United States, a case...
April 27, 2026
CAC Release: Justices Push Back Against Government’s Claim of Unrestricted Access to Cell-Phone Location Information
WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Chatrie v....
March 31, 2026
CAC Release: Supreme Court Considers Availability of Habeas Relief in Mississippi Jury Race-Discrimination Case
WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Pitchford v....
U.S. Supreme Court
Chatrie v. United States
In Chatrie v. United States, the Supreme Court is considering whether “geofence warrants” violate the Fourth Amendment.