STAY CONNECTED

SIGN UP FOR CAC UPDATES

SEARCH TEXT & HISTORY

ABOUT TEXT & HISTORY

Text & History is a project of the Constitutional Accountability Center (CAC), a think tank and public interest law firm dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution. Through in-depth legal reporting and analysis, we aim to show readers how the Constitution fundamentally upholds progressive outcomes. Learn more…

RECENT POSTS

RECENT COMMENTS

  • Jeff Stratford says "Wow! I’m completely overwhelmed. I’m stuck back on the concept of corporations..."
  • NunyaAnon says "District Attorneys, prosecutors, and law enforcement officials who participate in such frauds are..."
  • Boo-urns says "Impeach the 5 traitors to the Republic, or barring that, follow the lead of FDR and pack the Court."
  • Patricia Cavallaro says "This decision is truly frightening. Corporate control of our democracy was already rampant..."
  • Randall Hinton says "Agreed Thomas, The founders would roll over in their graves to realize the lack of care that we..."

ISSUE AREAS

COMMENTARY

BLOGROLL

ARCHIVES

Today in the News, 3.9.09

  • “‘We think Justice Thomas got it exactly right.’” CAC President Doug Kendall is quoted in Sunday’s LA Times, discussing Clarence Thomas’ concurring opinion in last week’s Supreme Court decision in Wyeth v. Levine.
  • “‘What we’re trying to do is maintain as much voter input as possible, but . . . minimize the requirement that (judges) have to go out and raise money to stay in office,’ Duncan said.” The El Paso Times reports that a Texas state senator has introduced legislation to reform judicial elections in Texas, following recent comments by Chief Justice Wallace Jefferson of the Texas Supreme Court, encouraging the state legislature to move away from judicial elections. (Also stemming from Caperton v. Massey, the Detroit News reports that the Michigan Supreme Court has begun creating formal rules for when justices must recuse themselves.)
  • “The Republicans’ rush to threaten filibusters in the absence of actual nominees is not only at odds with their previous views on the subject, but shows a lack of respect for the confirmation process.” Finally, the NY Times editorial board weighs in on the recent letter sent by Senate Republicans to President Obama, threatening to filibuster his judicial nominations.

Write a comment