Constitutional Accountability Center Adds Two New Members To Its Board Of Directors

Washington, DC – Constitutional Accountability Center is proud to announce the addition of two new members to its Board of Directors: Vivek H. Maru, founder and CEO of Namati, an NGO that is focused on grassroots legal advocacy in communities around the world, and Andrew J. Pincus, a partner in the law firm Mayer Brown in Washington, D.C.. 

 

CAC President Elizabeth Wydra said, “Vivek and Andy are amazing additions to an already stellar group of Board members. Each is a national leader in his respective field of legal advocacy, whose guidance will be indispensable to us as we navigate challenges and opportunities for advancing progressive constitutional values in the years to come. Vivek’s experience in the nonprofit sector is nothing short of extraordinary, providing a unique perspective that will add immense value to the work we do, while Andy is an indefatigable advocate and an institution in the Supreme Court bar, whose wisdom will only help deepen CAC’s already impressive impact on the courts.”

 

“I couldn’t be more excited for the future of CAC,” Wydra said.

 

Maru and Pincus join CAC Board Chair Eldie Acheson, Yale Law School Professor Akhil Amar, Ropes & Gray partner Peter Erichsen, Judge Juliet McKenna, and Harvard Graduate School of Education Dean Jim Ryan. Full biographies of Maru and Pincus are below.

 

#

 

Vivek H. Maru is founder and CEO of Namati, an NGO that is focused on grassroots legal advocacy in communities around the world. Vivek founded Namati in 2011, and with its partners has built cadres of grassroots legal advocates – also known as “community paralegals”– in ten countries. The advocates have worked with over 40,000 people to protect community lands, enforce environmental law, and secure basic rights to healthcare and citizenship. From 2003 to 2007, Vivek co-founded and co-directed the Sierra Leonean organization Timap for Justice, which has been recognized by the International Crisis Group, Transparency International, and President Jimmy Carter as a pioneering model for delivering justice services in the context of a weak state and a plural legal system. From 2007 to 2011, he served as senior counsel in the Justice Reform Group of the World Bank. His work focused on rule of law reform and governance, primarily in West Africa and South Asia. Vivek serves on the board of trustees of Avaaz, the international advisory council of the Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, the advisory board of the evaluation firm ID Insight, and the board of the International Senior Lawyers Project. He was an affiliate expert with the UN Commission on Legal Empowerment, and is a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations. Vivek graduated from Harvard College, magna cum laude, and Yale Law School. He writes regularly in academic journals and in the press. He also directs the Legal Empowerment Leadership Course at Central European University.

 

Andrew J. Pincus is a partner in the law firm Mayer Brown LLP in Washington, D.C.  Andy focuses his appellate practice on briefing and arguing cases in the Supreme Court of the United States and in federal and state appellate courts, developing legal strategy for trial courts, and presenting policy and legal arguments to Congress, state legislatures, and regulatory agencies. Andy is a former Assistant to the Solicitor General in the United States Department of Justice, has argued 25 cases in the Supreme Court, and is the co-founder and current co-director of the Yale Law School’s Supreme Court Advocacy Clinic (2006-present), which provides pro bono representation in 10-15 Supreme Court cases each year. , Andy’s practice also includes detailed written and oral advocacy before Congress, other legislative bodies, and regulatory agencies regarding a variety of policy and legal issues. Before rejoining Mayer Brown, Andy served as General Counsel of Andersen Worldwide S.C. Following his law school graduation, Andy was a law clerk  to the Honorable Harold H. Greene, United States District Court for the District of Columbia (1981-1982), after which he practiced with another major law firm in Washington. Andy received his B.A. cum laude from Yale College in 1977 and his J.D. from Columbia University Law School.

 

##

 

Constitutional Accountability Center (www.theusconstitution.org) is a think tank, public interest law firm, and action center dedicated to fulfilling the progressive promise of the Constitution’s text and history.

 

###

More from

Voting Rights and Democracy
December 9, 2025

CAC Release: Major Campaign Finance Case Tests Court’s Willingness to Respect Congress’s Policy Judgments Aimed at Curbing Harmful Corruption

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in National Republican...
By: Miriam Becker-Cohen, David H. Gans
Rule of Law
December 8, 2025

CAC Release: Conservative Justices Neglect History at Oral Argument in Monumental Case about Independent Agencies

WASHINGTON, DC – Following oral argument at the Supreme Court this morning in Trump v....
By: Brian R. Frazelle, Michelle Berger
Rule of Law
U.S. Supreme Court

Pung v. Isabella County

In Pung v. Isabella County, the Supreme Court is considering whether the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment is implicated when a local government seizes real property to satisfy a tax debt and then...
Civil and Human Rights
December 5, 2025

Supreme Court Lets Stand a Two-Tiered System of Justice That Deprives Military Families of the Same Rights Afforded to Civilians

The Rutherford Institute
WASHINGTON, DC — In a ruling that leaves thousands of military servicemembers and their families...
Rule of Law
December 11, 2025

Raises Serious Legal Questions: Wydra on Boat Strike

Bloomberg
Constitutional Accountability Center President Elizabeth Wydra weighs in on the second strike by the United...
Immigration and Citizenship
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

Al Otro Lado v. Trump

In Al Otro Lado v. Trump, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California is considering whether the Trump Administration can prohibit certain people from seeking asylum at ports of entry.